STATEMENT
I see my work as a laboratory for understanding the magic of time and emotions in the creative collaboration between human and ai.
I see my work as a laboratory for understanding the magic of time and emotion within the creative process. Each of my digital paintings is a durational object: every brushstroke, every line of code carries the imprint of lived time. This deliberate slowness is not an act of resistance against acceleration, but a way to react and provoke the fundamental question: what distinguishes human creation from machine creation?
For me, the answer lies in temporality and emotion. Humans require time, substantial time, to create, observe, process, and understand. Where artificial intelligence produces in milliseconds, we dwell in minutes, hours, days. This is not inefficiency, but a deeper, embodied form of intelligence, one that allows for error, emotion, and emergence.
My practice explores this temporal gap through collaborative protocols with AI and LLMs, creating two-way learning systems where human intuition and machine logic inform each other. I’m particularly interested in how these collaborations can unlock new pathways for emotional access and expression, using technology not to replace human feeling and creativity but to expand our vocabulary for it.
In this space, error becomes poetry. Glitches, those unanticipated ruptures, mark the moments when human consciousness asserts itself against computational perfection. Each mistake opens a window onto what remains irreducibly human.
In an era of instant generation, I choose to work in the space of duration, that uniquely human dimension where time becomes not just a constraint, but a creative force. My practice is a call to reimagine the idea of intelligence, error and collaboration as a fertile ground for emotional insight. In this layered terrain, I invite viewers to witness not only the image, but the rhythms and hesitations that shaped it, each gesture a trace of what it means to feel, to think, and to create in time.